|
Dear All,
It’s April and at last Spring is here! I hope you all enjoyed a happy Easter break. WWAFE has much good news to report:
1. News of our Patrons
For years, our sole Patron has been Baroness Harris of Richmond and a huge support she has been, despite her heavy workload in the House of Lords. Her many qualities have now been recognised by her appointment as Chair of the powerful Industry and Parliamentary Trust, a job which she takes up after the election. We send our hearty congratulations.
Next, I am delighted to announce a second Patron – David Kilgour of Canada (www.david-kilgour.com). David is a former Cabinet Minister and Crown Prosecutor who carries out an astonishing programme of international travel, promoting liberty, human rights and the rule of law. He has recently visited 44 countries to raise awareness of the fact that that tens of thousands of Falun Gong practitioners have been killed by the Chinese regime in the process of extracting their organs for lucrative transplant surgery. Together with David Matas, he co-authored Bloody Harvest: the killing of Falun Gong for their organs, a 2009 book detailing the evidence for this. Both men have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Canadian MP Boris Wrzesnewskyj and we are supporting this campaign. I am delighted that WWAFE has the support of this special man: the gender distinction in our fight for universal human rights grows increasingly irrelevant.
2. Was WAFE – is now WWAFE!
WAFE was founded in 2004 at a meeting called by the Women’s Council of the National Council of Resistance of Iran in Paris, with the subtitle International Federation of Women against Fundamentalism and for Equality. WAFE founders accepted from the beginning that women’s human rights were seriously challenged by all extremist religious regimes. The new organisation would accordingly continue to support resistance to the extremist regime in Iran, but would also work to expose the misogyny of other such regimes. WAFE would also strongly promote the ideology of universal human rights. With the assistance of NCRI the WAFE website was set up and its logo designed.
Thereafter, WAFE in fact operated increasingly independently of NCRI and was based in London for most of its activities. For various reasons, it became necessary to remove the word ‘Fundamentalism’ from the title and it was changed, with the agreement of the Board, to Women Worldwide Advancing Freedom and Equality.
In the autumn of 2009, the Women’s Council of the National Council of Resistance of Iran claimed ownership of the title WAFE and of the logo. They proposed that WAFE should either amalgamate with the Council, or formalise a separate identity. Following discussions in Paris last month, it was agreed that the Women’s Council needed to concentrate on resistance to the present regime in Iran, while the present WAFE Board and members were committed to a more international movement. It was agreed that the two organisations would therefore work separately while offering mutual support.
It was further agreed that the Women’s Council should retain the title WAFE and the logo and would resume the original subtitle. The organisation recently known as WAFE would become WWAFE (Women Worldwide Advancing Freedom and Equality) with a new logo, currently being worked on.
For the present, WWAFE will continue with WAFE’s 2010 programme of meetings on the theme of Equality, maintaining the website and Newsletter, developing projects and fundraising. In November a new Board and Officers will be elected, who will review our Mission Statement and relate it to future activities.
3. Volunteers Committee
Yet more good news. Alice Fuller and Debra Wilson, both active volunteers, have been co-opted to our Board. Alice plans to develop our lobbying skills and Debra hopes to develop more projects. Our dear Clemmie is currently busy with exams, but will shortly be resuming her valuable help in the office.
4. AGM of the Commission on the Status of Women
The 2010 AGM of CSW took place in March. It passed seven resolutions, to be seen at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing15/outcomes.html
They included a continuing protest at the impact of HIV/AIDS on the girl child, the plight of women hostages and of Palestinian women, the lack of women’s economic empowerment, the need to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity and condemnation of female genital mutilation.
CSW also pushed for the UN to get on with a composite entity to reflect women’s concerns. We wait until September to know about this – who is to lead the organisation? How is it to be funded?
5. Abolition of the Death Penalty (Amnesty Report)
This campaign was launched in 1977, when the death penalty was still in operation in 137 countries. Today, that is down to 58 countries. Public execution does not exonerate the community from dealing with the huge social problems each convict represents, and it remains a revolting public spectacle. An increasing number of countries now recognises this, alas not including China, where the death penalty applies to 68 offences and has been applied (it is estimated) to thousands. Nor of course, Iran, where there were at least 112 executions between the disputed election of President Ahmadinejad and his inauguration (two months). In the EU, only one country retains the death penalty – Belarus. It has been applied twice in 2010. In the US, only 15 states have banned it, although implementation varies widely.
6. Religion in the UK
Britain’s religious status remains ambiguous. Public behaviour suggests that we operate as a secular state, tolerant of many faiths, whilst our institutions retain adherence to State support of Christianity.
The British Humanist Society, which promotes human rights and equalities without adherence to a religious faith, has come under attack from the (established) Church of England for, in their view, criticising religious faith and offering few solutions to world problems. Nevertheless, support for secular government seems to be growing worldwide. Fewer people now accept that criticism of religion is ‘a serious affront to human dignity’ as stated in the UN Human Rights Defamation of Religion resolution (20 in favour, 17 against).
Both BHA and the Church, however, welcome the UK Government’s commitment to equality of us all, regardless of belief.
7. Other Problems in the Churches
The unfolding horror of paedophiliac practices among Roman Catholic priests raises many problems. How can a worldwide organisation which upholds moral standards ignore, or provide only palliative measures to deal with, its criminal servants. There should be many repercussions from this crisis. Let us hope that they include a better understanding of both human sexuality and democratic criminal law. Have Catholic women taken any action?
Come to that, the Anglican Church in Uganda has not shown much Christian love towards its homosexual members recently. Christopher Senyonjo, a retired Anglican bishop in Kampala, is believed to be the only member of the clergy still ministering to lesbian and gay Christians, now threatened by the repressive anti-homosexuality bill before Parliament. Under international pressure, the most draconian clause – the execution of some gays – has been removed. But the bill still calls for life imprisonment of those committing homosexual acts and requires those aware of such acts to turn offenders in within 24 hours (New International April 2010).
Fundamentalism begins here.
8. UK Parliamentary Reform??
WWAFE is full or respect from many women in the UK House of Lords – which does not prevent our seeking wholesale reform of this obsolete second chamber. The Evening Standard (15/3/10) reported that ministers were expected to unveil proposals for Lords reform early in April. These would include:
• Renaming the House, now possibly to be called the Senate
• Reducing the House from 704 to 300 members, to be elected by proportional representation for 15 years
• Current peers encouraged to take voluntary redundancy with generous payoffs (some live entirely on their daily allowance)
• Pay off amounts and wages for those elected to be set by the Senior Salaries Review Body.
Unresolved is what to do with the unelected Church of England bishops.
WWAFE members are likely to welcome all reforms in the direction of more democratic government – which could also give women a better chance of election.
Meanwhile, the House of Commons still has a shooting gallery but no crèche. See the report on our March meeting for a discussion of this patriarchal institution and what might be done to improve women’s representation.
In mid April I’m off to Paris to meet our Board member Maria Hapberg and Lilian Halls French, President of the European Feminist Initiative (EFI). I hope this will establish WWAFE on the International scene! I’ll let you know.
All good wishes,
Elizabeth Sidney
|